Geoharbour

What’s Soil Investigation in Construction work? And why should every construction project carry it out?

In the contemporary construction landscape, instances of soil failure and structural settlement are frequently observed, inevitably resulting in damages to property, time-consuming repairs, and compromised public safety. If we find an answer to the root cause of these issues, a critical factor often emerges: the neglect of the initial Soil Investigation (or Site Investigation) phase.
This essential step is frequently perceived as an “unnecessary expenditure of time and budget.” Consequently, some projects choose to rely on soil boring results from adjacent sites, assuming the subsurface strata “won’t differ significantly.” However, the reality is that a mere few meters of variation beneath the surface can entirely change the equation for foundation design.

This represents an engineering oversight that introduces avoidable risks, which ultimately leads to a “more expensive cost” in the long term—in the form of remedial work expenses, construction delays, and damage to the project’s reputation. The critical question, then, is: What is Soil Investigation? What are its key procedures? And why should “every project” consider this an indispensable, fundamental step? Let’s explore the answers in this article.

Table of Contents

What is Soil Investigation?

In the contemporary construction landscape, instances of soil failure and structural settlement are frequently observed, inevitably resulting in damages to property, time-consuming repairs, and compromised public safety. If we find answer into the root causes of these issues, a critical factor often emerges: the neglect of the initial Soil Investigation (or Site Investigation) phase.
This essential step is frequently perceived as an “unnecessary expenditure of time and budget.” Consequently, some projects choose to rely on soil boring results from adjacent sites, assuming the subsurface strata “won’t differ significantly.” However, the reality is that a mere few meters of variation beneath the surface can entirely change the equation for foundation design.
This represents an engineering oversight that introduces avoidable risks, which ultimately leads to a “more expensive cost” in the long term—in the form of remedial work expenses, construction delays, and damage to the project’s reputation. The critical question, then, is: What is Soil Investigation? What are its key procedures? And why should “every project” consider this an indispensable, fundamental step? Let’s explore the answers in this article.

What are the risks of skipping soil investigation?

An Example picture of settlement due from residentials estate in bangkok. 

Neglecting the soil investigation phase can lead to substantial engineering failures and risks, such as:
  1. Risk of Foundation Failure
Soil with weaker properties than anticipated may fail to support the imposed loads, leading to foundation settlement or cracking.
  1. Reduced Structural Stability
Buildings can experience differential settlement, causing the structure to tilt, twist, or experience excessive cracking.
  1. Increased Remedial Costs and Construction Time
The need for extensive redesign or remedial construction work mid-project results in significant budget overruns, far exceeding the initial cost of proper investigation.
  1. Safety and Legal Liability
Should accidents occur due to design errors stemming from insufficient data, the engineers and project owners may face direct legal accountability.

Field Methods You Should Know

In Geotechnical Engineering, soil investigation is not limited to simple Soil Boring and Standard Penetration Tests (SPT). There are various In-situ Test techniques and sampling methods that can be used as alternatives or complementary tools to ensure comprehensive data collection. The following table (not included here, but referenced in the original text) would typically summarize common methods found in Thailand.

Method

Principle (Summary)

Advantage

Limitations/ Disadvantage

Typical Use Cases

Soil Boring + Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Uses Rotary Drilling or Percussion Drilling. At the required depth, a split-spoon sampler is driven into the soil to measure the penetration resistance (N-value) and collect soil samples for laboratory testing.

– Immediate soil classification can be performed in the field.

– Obtains actual soil samples (Disturbed / Undisturbed).

– Provides data for Bearing Capacity assessment and samples for comprehensive lab testing.

– Applicable to all soil types.

– A globally recognized standard method (ASTM D1586).

– Low cost and can be integrated with the drilling process.

– Time consuming

– Provides point data only (non-continuous profile).

– Accuracy is dependent on the driller and equipment condition.

General foundations, buildings, roads, dams, and most types of structural design work.

Cone Penetration Test (CPT)

pushed into the soil at a constant speed (20 mm/s). It measures Cone Resistance and Sleeve Friction which can be correlated to estimate the SPT N-value.

– Provides continuous data throughout the depth.

– Enables detailed analysis of soil type and density/consistency.

– Fast and time-saving.

– Cost-effective when performed in large quantities compared to standard soil boring.

– Does not obtain actual soil samples.

– Not usable in soils containing gravel or boulders

– Equipment is relatively expensive.

Suitable for fine-grained to sandy soils; metro and tunnel projects, offshore investigations, and detailed foundation design.

Vane Shear Test (VST)

A rotating vane is inserted into soft clay to measure the Undrained Shear Strength

– Simple, fast, and inexpensive to perform.

– Highly suitable for soft cohesive clays.

– Not suitable for stiff clays (typically N-value > 12)

– Test results are sensitive to soil disturbance during insertion, which may lead to misleading results.

Embankments, dams, and foundations built on soft clay deposits.

Table presenting examples of soil investigation methods commonly used in Thailand

Engineering Summary of Field Investigation Methods

  • SPT is the global baseline for most projects: you get N-values and real samples for lab testing.

Example picture of SPT from Constro Facilitator

  • CPT provide high-resolution continuous profiles—excellent for underground works, metros, offshore, or where stratigraphy changes quickly.

Example picture of CPT method

  • VST is the go-to for soft clay Su mapping.

Example picture of VST method from STATS Australia

Note: If budget and time allow, utilizing a Hybrid Method combining SPT and CPT is highly recommended. This approach secures both “actual soil samples” (from SPT) and “continuous density/consistency readings” (from CPT), which collectively minimizes the uncertainty (Uncertainty) in foundation design to the greatest extent possible.

Critical Planning Guidelines for Field Soil Investigation

Determining the Optimal Number, Spacing, and Depth of Boreholes

Defining the number, spacing, and depth of boreholes is a critical design step that must be tailored to the site characteristics, structure type, and the objective of the investigation. Generally, the Geotechnical Designer or design engineer is responsible for establishing these parameters, the testing methods, and the appropriate borehole locations for each project.

Number and Spacing of Boreholes

The appropriate number and spacing of boreholes depend not only on the building’s size and type but also on the following key factors:
Type of Structures
Due to variations in size, shape, and construction budget, the suitability of the number and spacing of boreholes can be estimated (as suggested by preliminary guidelines like Teng, 1962.

Type of structure

Recommended Borehole Spacing (meters)

Engineering Rationale

Small Residential Buildings

(1–2 Storeys)

30 – 60

The structure has a low weight and a shallow foundation. Frequent drilling is often unnecessary. Spacing can be extended up to $60text{ m}$ if the soil is uniform, but a minimum of two boreholes is required to confirm soil continuity across the site.

Medium-Sized Buildings

(5–10 Storeys)

20 – 30

Applied loads begin to increase, leading to a higher potential for noticeable settlement. Closer spacing helps detect variations in the soil strata, such as intermittent sand layers or soft zones, ensuring consistency across the site.

High-Rise Buildings

(Over 10 Storeys)

10 – 20

High structural loads typically necessitate deep foundations (e.g., large piles). Detailed information on the Bearing Stratum (the soil or rock layer strong enough to support the structure) is essential to prevent discrepancies in the actual bearing capacity of individual piles.

Roads / Highways

200 – 500

These are long, linear structures with evenly distributed loads. Increased spacing helps reduce cost. The focus is on adding boreholes only at critical structures (e.g., bridges, underpasses) or where topography changes significantly.

Bridges / Piers / Viaducts

1–2 boreholes per pier location

Each pier or abutment sustains a large, concentrated point load. Investigation must be performed directly at each foundation location to precisely determine the supporting soil properties.

Dams / Earth Embankments

50 – 100

These are long structures where the continuity of the foundation soil is crucial. Investigation must check the alignment for potential fault lines, discontinuities, or soft soil inclusions that could cause seepage or differential settlement and failure.

Large Industrial Plants / Complexes

50 – 100

These sites have large areas and often feature unevenly distributed loads (e.g., heavy machinery areas, liquid storage tanks). The site should be divided into zones, ensuring the investigation covers all critical loading areas comprehensively.

Table presenting preliminary recommended number and spacing of boreholes (Teng, 1962)
Soil Variability
  • If the site’s soil strata are relatively uniform, the number of boreholes can be reduced, and the spacing increased without compromising data accuracy, thus saving time and cost.
  • Conversely, if the soil is complex or rapidly changing, a higher density of boreholes is required to obtain sufficiently detailed data for reliable analysis and foundation design.
Purpose of Investigation
Preliminary Exploration
Often used for large public sector projects or during the pre-tender stage to gain general soil information. Fewer boreholes may be sufficient.
Detailed Design
Requires an increased number of boreholes to obtain comprehensive data necessary for detailed geotechnical engineering analysis and foundation design.

Depth of Boreholes

The depth of the borehole is arguably the most critical parameter. It must be sufficient to:
  1. Obtain data for all soil layers that will be affected by the foundation loads.
  2. Penetrate deep enough to identify any underlying soft or loose soil strata that could cause short- or long-term settlement.
The required depth generally correlates with the foundation type, structural load, and local soil conditions:
  • Roads or Small-to-Medium Buildings: Investigation depths typically range from 10 to 30 meters, or until a hard stratum (SPT N-value $\ge 50$) is encountered for two to three consecutive intervals.
  • Large Structures (High-rises, Bridges, Piers): Due to extremely high loads, drilling may be required to depths of 30 to over 60 meters, or until a competent bedrock layer capable of supporting the structure is reached.
The common Termination Criteria (when to stop drilling) typically involves:
  • Reaching an SPT N-value $\ge 50$ for three consecutive intervals (or equivalent resistance).
  • Encountering hard stratum or weathered rock where standard casing cannot be driven further.
  • It is crucial to penetrate the first hard layer by an additional 3 to 5 meters (or 2 to 3 intervals) to confirm it is a true bearing layer and not just a thin, hard crust.

Conclusion

Soil Investigation is an absolutely fundamental and indispensable step in construction, critical to the safety and stability of the final structure. This process of gathering soil properties is directly applied to the engineering design of a safe and appropriate foundation.
Neglecting this step can lead to severe issues like structural settlement, foundation cracking, or even collapse, resulting not only in time and budget overruns but also significant safety and legal liabilities.
The standard method involves Soil Boring combined with the SPT to determine soil consistency at various depths, providing a globally recognized standard value. Soil samples retrieved are crucial for subsequent Laboratory Testing (Lab Test) to determine additional soil characteristics. Supplemental methods like CPT and VST should be used for specialized requirements or when high-resolution data is needed.
In summary, Soil Investigation is a worthwhile investment that minimizes design uncertainty, prevents costly future damage, and ensures the structure stands safely and sustainably in the long term. “Soil Investigation is not an expense; it is an investment in the project’s stability,” because foundation problems are far more difficult to rectify later than changing building materials.

Further Reading

  1. คู่มือวิศวกรรมปฐพีฐานราก (Foundation Engineering Handbook) – ดร.พัลลภ วิสุทธิ์เมธานุกูล
  2. “ความรู้ทั่วไปในการเจาะสำรวจชั้นดิน” “วิธีการเจาะสำรวจดิน” – นายยงยุทธ ศรีเมฆารัตน์
  3. เทคนิคก่อสร้าง – ผศ. วิทวัส สิทธิกูล (2557)

Follow us on other channels

Facebook: Facebook Profile 

Linkedin: Linkedin Profile

Scroll to Top